[ntp:questions] Re: ntp sanity limit kills ntp daily
keeling at spots.ab.ca
Tue Jun 14 15:21:27 UTC 2005
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.setup.]
Mark <none at nonenadaspam.com>:
> Colliermeister wrote:
> > Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >> Michael Ward <michaelward at sprintmail.com> writes:
> >>> I've configured my FC3 system to run ntp successfully at boot time
> >>> and ntp
> >>> seems to run successfully for about a day. However, every night the
> >>> clock
> >>> looses some 1200 seconds while the system is busy making backups.
> > http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/miscopt.html
> Can someone explain why motherboard companies don't just
> spend an extra $2 and install real quartz based clocks on
> motherboards so all this nonsense about losing time would
> be a non-issue?
... And real uarts in Winmodems, and real print machinery in printers?
That's six bucks right there. With PCs now selling @ $300.00, six
bucks thrown away (in their eyes) per $300.00 sale is a significant
portion of their revenue.
Besides, no-one's forcing you to buy that @#$%.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
More information about the questions