[ntp:questions] Re: server's address in ntp payload?
mayer at ntp.isc.org
Fri Nov 25 20:11:03 UTC 2005
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> As for the refid, please see:
> and my comment on 01 Nov 2004 and my last comment dated 17 Jun 2005.
> The current refid is apparently sufficient for its intended purpose.
> The issue seems to be "we now have greater needs and how do we best solve
What exactly is this "greater need"? If you don't spell it out how can
we know what you are talking about? If there is a greater need why is it
not being discussed in the NTP WG?
More information about the questions