[ntp:questions] Re: set your alarms
netnews at derobert.net
Thu Apr 6 00:15:36 UTC 2006
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:29:14 +0000, David J Taylor wrote:
> .. although only if you use one particular, rather illogical, day
> numbering convention where the significance order is mixed up throughout
> the date string. Using a more logical convention, where significance
> increases uniformly, you still have a month to go.
60/61, 60, 60, 24, 28/30/31, 365/366: real uniform there :-D
I'll take ISO 8601 as the one, true date format, please. I don't claim its
uniform, just unambiguous.
More information about the questions