[ntp:questions] Re: WWVB 60kHz Receiver
David L. Mills
mills at udel.edu
Mon Apr 17 03:11:20 UTC 2006
THe Spectracom receiver is actually very good. It can pull the signal
from beneath the noise (literally), but doesn't do well with cochannel
signals. What I saw on the scope was a substantial carrier modulated
with 60-Hz square wave(!). That's why I suspect an arc welder. I called
in the power company and they were quite cooperative (heck; they were
hams themselves). It was easy to verify the crud quickly dived under the
noise when more than a couple hundred feet from the power line. I could
probably fix it at home with line filters.
Outboard DSP might help, but I would DC coupling and the only thing I
have around for that is an old DSP93. Heck; not this year.
Hal Murray wrote:
>>The WWVB signal has become degraded in recent years and now all WWVB
>>receivers here have been retired. Here in Delaware we are on the 100
>>microvolt per meter contour (before the WWVB transmitter upgrade) and
>>normally this would be sufficient for good accuracy. However, at least
>>here in Newark, there is another strong signal on 60 kHz that interferes
>>with WWVB. I chased this down to power-line conducted EMI and found the
>>interferiing signal was well above the noise several miles from campus.
>>It's not clear where it originates, but the prime suspect is a power
>>inverter for an arc welder at the Chrysler plant in town.
> I'm not a wizard at this stuff. CPUs are cheap these days.
> Would it be possible to pull the signal out of the junk
> with some serious DSP hacking?
> At the back of an envelope level, how would one answer
> that question?
> On the other hand, NIST recently upgraded the transmitter
> at WWVB, so somebody must think this is a valuable service.
> Do they have anybody tracking the EMI issues?
> Who uses WWVB these days? Have serious time hackers all switched
> to GPS, leaving "atomic clocks" as the only customer?
More information about the questions