[ntp:questions] Re: NTP sync on a standalone network (Windows 2k)
alex_s_p_a_m at carrausse.com
Fri Aug 18 21:59:51 UTC 2006
"Hal Murray" <hmurray at suespammers.org> wrote in message
news:_L2dnc1lD-lW5HjZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d at megapath.net...
> Using a single system as the master seems like a reasonable approach
> to me. It's simple so you can understand it. Just fixup the time
> by hand when it drifts too far off.
That's my plan. Today my system is 9 minutes below the real time. I can't
add 9 minutes in one go otherwise everything would crash. But I could add
one minute every morning during nine days and it would be fine.
> The main source of error in most systems is the initial accuracy
> of the crystal when it comes from the factory. That's a constant.
> You can measure it and correct for it. After that, your systems
> will keep pretty good time. (That's how we used to do it before
> The next source of error is the shift in frequency as the temperature
> changes. Is the temperature in your bunker stable? If so, that
> helps a lot.
The aircon system is good so I am quite confident that it is stable.
> Is the load on your system stable or bursty? Self heating is important.
> It might help to allocate a separate box to being your NTP server.
The load is stable on the main server as it is only providing the active
directory. Not very busy (not like a db backup).
> adjtimex is the utility to tweak the clock frequency.
Seems interesting in the long run.
The only data I have found looks like code to be compiled for Unix. Anything
ready for Windows?
> The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my
> other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or
> commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other
> These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
More information about the questions