[ntp:questions] Re: PPS working or not? FreeBSD 5.4
David J Taylor
david-taylor at blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk.invalid
Thu Feb 2 10:17:55 UTC 2006
Eugen COCA wrote:
> For sure, FreeBSD does not have PPS_SYNC enabled by default.
> NTP developers say that the ntpd service does not need PPS_SYNC
> enabled as you activate PPS in ntp.conf (enable pps). But, as we may
> see in the graphs, there is an enormous difference between the two
> All my three servers are "web enabled" and the configurations are
> visible if you put the mouse over the "hardware" word in the page.
> The main problem (as I think) with your configuration is that the GPS
> receiver does not see the whole sky. I have 2 GPS receivers (one of
> them connected with ntp1 and the other with ntp2 and ntp3 - YES, it
> works) mounted on the top of the roof (100% clear sky). Your error is
> almost the same at almost the same time. Look at the graphs !
> You may test all your servers with only one GPS receiver, at the same
> time. I made a test and it works - one GPS receiver and three servers.
I'm hoping that one of the NTP developers will come back on this - my
understanding now is that there is a "software PPS", treated just like any
other sync source, and a "kernel PPS" which is treated differently and
rather than be part of a phase-locked loop simply forces correct time. As
I've not looked at the sources, it is this latter "kernel PPS" I am unsure
Your PCs are all somewhat better specified than my old 133MHz/48MB
Pentium, but the timekeeping is similar as you say. The experimenter in
me want to get down from 10us jitter to 1us jitter, but I really don't
have the time to do this.
I have just 50% sky coverage in the present arrangement (I added a photo
to my Web page), so I will see how well that continues to work. As I run
Windows on everything else here, there seems little point in splitting the
GPS receiver feed, but it sounds an excellent idea.
More information about the questions