[ntp:questions] Re: ntpd transmit timestamp precision
mayer at ntp.isc.org
Wed Feb 15 13:27:31 UTC 2006
Damion de Soto wrote:
> David L. Mills wrote:
>> Please don't copy my presonal mailbox with postings to this list. I
>> routinely throw them away without reading.
>> See ntp-dev/libntp/systime.c line 85.
> ahh, this is only the beta and dev versions.
> I've been playing with the 4.2.0 production version and sometimes I get
> fuzz, sometimes I don't - so i guess it's just magic CPU fuzz.
> Using 4.2.0b and manually forcing HAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME off gives me the
> correct randomization of the low bits.
> Which then takes us back to the semi-original problem.
> Should the ntp_random() function be applied to the result of
> clock_gettime() and getclock() ?
> In my situation I would say yes - I can't see why it shouldn't always
> fuzz it.
> Do any of the developers read this group, or should I submit a bug/patch
> some other way?
Of course we do. If you think you have a bug and/or fix, please submit
it. We can always decide later if it really is a bug or enhancement.
Make sure you check it against the latest development release.
More information about the questions