[ntp:questions] Re: Linux 2.6 + PPS + ntpd?
Ulrich.Windl at RZ.Uni-Regensburg.DE
Fri Jan 20 13:05:44 UTC 2006
hmurray at suespammers.org (Hal Murray) writes:
> >2.4 vanilla kernels plus Ulrich' PPSkit-patches are easy to get
> > going. Not tried 2.6 myself. But do you need the kernel PPSAPI? ntpd
> > can do that outside the kernel as well. Sorry my only pps
> > signal going to a Linux machine is using above 2.4-nano kernel.
> There are two parts to the PPSAPI. One is capturing the time
> the PPS signal changes so user code (ntpd) can analyze it.
> The other is including (one version of) that analysis in the
> kenel to discipline the system clock.
> I think the PPSKit for 2.4 included both parts and the 2.6 version
> does not include the clock discipline code.
Correct! As said before: Linux 2.6 still has the old NTP kernel code. As long
as there is no nanosecond clock for Linux 2.6, you'll have to wait. (I had
implemented a new nanosecond clock for Linux 2.4, but it never made it into
the mainstream kernel. I won't do that again, but let the others (who know
better) do it).
For 2.6 you only get the PPS API's essential parts (plus the parallel port
More information about the questions