[ntp:questions] notrust alternative?

Richard B. Gilbert rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Sun Nov 5 17:14:52 UTC 2006


David Woolley wrote:

> In article <NOadnekO3ZIEcdDYnZ2dnUVZ_h2dnZ2d at comcast.com>,
> Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>"sunblok" and "sunburn" are two servers on my local network.  On 
>>"sunblok" I can say "peer sunburn" and on "sunburn" I can say "peer 
>>sunblok".  It works!
> 
> 
> I believe this constitutes symmetric active, when Dave Mills is
> talking about symmetric passive, where only one side actually 
> has the association configured.

Is "symmetric passive" different from just saying, in ntp.conf:
"server sunblok iburst"?  For the record,  that works without problems too!




More information about the questions mailing list