[ntp:questions] notrust alternative?
Richard B. Gilbert
rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Sun Nov 5 17:14:52 UTC 2006
David Woolley wrote:
> In article <NOadnekO3ZIEcdDYnZ2dnUVZ_h2dnZ2d at comcast.com>,
> Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>"sunblok" and "sunburn" are two servers on my local network. On
>>"sunblok" I can say "peer sunburn" and on "sunburn" I can say "peer
>>sunblok". It works!
> I believe this constitutes symmetric active, when Dave Mills is
> talking about symmetric passive, where only one side actually
> has the association configured.
Is "symmetric passive" different from just saying, in ntp.conf:
"server sunblok iburst"? For the record, that works without problems too!
More information about the questions