[ntp:questions] Re: time.ucla.edu is closed
mayer at ntp.isc.org
Tue Sep 5 03:36:22 UTC 2006
Felix Tilley wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:54:39 +0000, Danny Mayer wrote:
>> NTP has never used TCP.
>> Where did you see that this system has public access? The notice
>> attached to the list for tick (time is a CNAME) shows the following:
>> AccessDetails: Open access to stratum-2 servers and to UCLA clients.
>> So why are you trying to access it?
> It uses ntpdate -ub. I am on a dialup. No broadband here.
> I didn't mean to cause so much trouble here. I will wait until
> the holiday is over, and contact ucla.edu.
Don't bother, you have no right to use it. Please desist and use
something else like the pool.
> I thank all of you for your help.
> Last syncmyclock update Mon, 04 Sep 2006 11:29:28 -0700
> 4 Sep 12:48:12 ntpdate: step time server 220.127.116.11 offset 0.174213 sec
> 4 Sep 12:48:14 ntpdate: step time server 18.104.22.168 offset -0.004097 sec
> 4 Sep 12:48:16 ntpdate: step time server 22.214.171.124 offset 0.002223 sec
> 4 Sep 12:48:20 ntpdate: no server suitable for synchronization found
> 4 Sep 12:48:22 ntpdate: step time server 126.96.36.199 offset 0.000743 sec
> 4 Sep 12:48:25 ntpdate: step time server 188.8.131.52 offset 0.002183 sec
> Synching Hardware Clock to System Clock
I have no interest in reviewing your list to see if any of them have
access restrictions but you should be using the pool and not stratum 1
or 2 servers. You are ignoring the Rules of Engagement. Under no
circumstances should you be using Stratum 1 servers for this.
More information about the questions