[ntp:questions] why is this clock not even considered?

Hal Murray hal-usenet at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
Tue Dec 25 21:33:30 UTC 2007


>Why is the '.SHM.'-clock not even considered? Because of the negative offset?

Negative offsets are not a problem.  They happen all the time.

My guess is that something your new driver is setting up
makes your clock look not-very-good.  It's probably one of the
obscure constants that aren't well documented.

You might look at the code in gpsd.  It's known to work.

-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




More information about the questions mailing list