[ntp:questions] why is this clock not even considered?
Hal Murray
hal-usenet at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
Tue Dec 25 21:33:30 UTC 2007
>Why is the '.SHM.'-clock not even considered? Because of the negative offset?
Negative offsets are not a problem. They happen all the time.
My guess is that something your new driver is setting up
makes your clock look not-very-good. It's probably one of the
obscure constants that aren't well documented.
You might look at the code in gpsd. It's known to work.
--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
More information about the questions
mailing list