[ntp:questions] Dispaying nanoseconds

Eugen COCA ecoca at eed.usv.ro
Thu Feb 15 17:42:33 UTC 2007


On Feb 15, 2:35 am, "David L. Mills" <m... at udel.edu> wrote:
> David,
>
> Note that the nonsignificant bits at the low end of the fraction word
> are purposly filled with a random bitstring. My machine has a precisioni
> -19, so there are 19 meaningful bits in the fraction along with a
> carefully manufactured 13 bits of fuzz. This is done both to make it
> harder to predict timestamps and smooth out tiny wiggles due to roundoff
> and bias. It doesn't make sense to split the microseconds in the
> readouts. For what it's worth, the statistics files display offsets to
> the nanosecond.
>
> Dave
>

Dave,

clear for me too. I'll use the information in loopstats file to
display the offsets with nanoseconds precision.

Are there any .pl or .php scripts already tested to display the
offsets from the loppstats file ?

Thanks !




More information about the questions mailing list