[ntp:questions] Is 24PPM an Excessive Real-Time Clock Correction?
Richard B. Gilbert
rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Thu Jul 5 20:49:21 UTC 2007
David T. Ashley wrote:
> "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:468D4A70.9030508 at comcast.net...
>>David T. Ashley wrote:
>>>Any insight into whether 24 PPM is excessive for my server?
>>Consider that a computer manufacturer typically spends something like $2
>>US on the components for the clock!
>>24 PPM is pretty good. Anything up to a hundred or two will usually work
> Thanks. Interesting. It seems to be a really steady error, i.e. seems to
> always be between 24 PPM and 24.5 PPM.
> I think I'll write a little software to plot it at a sampling frequency of
> once per hour. I'm wondering if it varies by time of day, temperature, etc.
I think you will find that the frequency correction varies with the
temperature inside the computer case. A really high quality clock would
put the quartz crystal inside a tiny "oven" in order to maintain a
constant temperature and, therefore, a constant frequency. The computer
manufacturers won't do it because it wouldn't earn them a cent!
More information about the questions