[ntp:questions] Petition to FCC for accurate timestamps and NTP
David J Taylor
david-taylor at blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.co.uk
Tue Jun 5 08:42:15 UTC 2007
Tony Rutkowski wrote:
> Hi David,
>> Attachements not allowed to a text newsgroup. Please provide a URL.
> enter "RM-11376" in box 1 and click on search.
> You will get the three documents in the docket.
> The public notice is 2 pages and describes the comment
> process created. The 74 page PET RM describes the
> proposed requirements. The relevant NTP related
> section is provided below. The explicit NPT references
> occur near the end of the section
>> Please be aware that the rest of the world no longer follows the US.
>> Were an international body involved, others might be more likely to
> Almost every country has a similar requirement. The standards
> followed globally are those of ETSI and have a required
> accuracy of one second, but with a recently changed precision
> expression option to one millisecond. The 200 millisecond
> requirement and reference to NTP will likely proceed in ETSI.
> Hope this helps.
Thanks for the extract, Tony. Interested as I may be, 74 pages is too
much! If it's ETSI, I would expect we would follow it.
Your three questions in response to Richard clarify your aims. You will
find (on this newsgroup, I think) references to surveys in this century.
More information about the questions