[ntp:questions] Consider the Undisciplined Local Clock synchronized at start-up
kostecke at ntp.isc.org
Fri Mar 30 12:06:10 UTC 2007
On 2007-03-30, Spoon <devnull at localhost.com> wrote:
> I've configured one box to serve its local clock to another box.
> (I want them to drift together.)
> When I start the "server" daemon, it takes a while (three minutes) for
> the local clock to be considered "synchronized".
This is normal.
> Thus, if I start the server and client together, the sender will refuse
> to reply to the client's iburst. (Please correct any misconception.)
The server will reply immediately that it is at Stratum 16. At that
point you've "used up" the initial burst.
> Is it possible to tell the server to consider his clock synchronized
> as soon as the daemon starts?
Steve Kostecke <kostecke at ntp.isc.org>
NTP Public Services Project - http://ntp.isc.org/
More information about the questions