[ntp:questions] stepping and slewing
david at djwhome.demon.co.uk
Wed May 9 07:59:36 UTC 2007
In article <slrnf41tff.11s.serge.bets at laposte.net>,
Serge Bets <serge.bets at NOSPAM.laposte.invalid> wrote:
> Are you sure? I have here a machine whose natural driftfile is -100 PPM.
> It still seems to slew 500 PPM in both directions, not -400 +600.
This may be a language problem. ntpdate and the part of the kernel that
implement the 500ppm limit have no idea what the static error of the clock
is, so if the clock frequency is 1,000,100 micro seconds of clock time per
second of real time, the positive slew will be 1,000,600 micro seconds per
second, and the negative slew will be 999,600 micro seconds per second.
It cannot slew at 1,000,500 or 999,500 because it has no idea that it is
already in error by 100. Internally, though, it will be using these figures
as the number of microseconds to add to the software clock for every HZ
clock interrupts, but HZ clock interrupts won't be exactly one second.
However, if you have an error of 100 ppm, it is worth using tickadj to
cancel the whole 100ppm's, in which case it's normal rate will be
999,900 microseconds per HZ interrupts and the positive and negative
slew adjustments will give values, which, when cancelled by the static
frequency error, will result in real time slew rates of +/- 500ppm.
I may have signs wrong, but that doesn't affect the argument.
More information about the questions