[ntp:questions] NTPd instability and openntpd
Richard B. Gilbert
rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Sat Sep 15 21:51:25 UTC 2007
Mij wrote:
> I submitted to pool.ntp.org with a stratum 2 NTPd server. The useful
> system scoring however shows me significant discontinuity in the
> service:
>
> http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/81.208.58.150
>
> The host is a dual processor FreeBSD host with low load, today
> counting 107 days of uptime. The connectivity is a 11Mbps fiber optic,
> that proven pretty reliable in the last five years.
> So I did not believe those stats first and put a polling script on
> another server 150 km away from this one. Unfortunately or not, it
> confirmed the downtimes.
>
> So NTPd seems the only point of guilt. I re-compiled with debugging
> enabled to trace the problem. I could be unable to read its debugging
> dumps, but its L1 and L2 debug levels proven useless to me. For
> example, none did show client request coming in, nor served nor
> rejected. L1 is quite a lot verbose and L2 is extremely verbose, so
> further levels would be simply unreadable to me.
>
> NTPd is not under explicit ulimit. Confs are nearly freebsd's defaults
> (5 servers are used and some statistics are enabled).
>
> In favour of sparing some time I tried possible alternatives. I see
> OpenNTPd favourably, as openbsd's software typically works simply and
> well. But I see some (old, not up to date) criticism on its precision
> and stuffing an imprecise server into the pool would be quite
> unethical.
>
> So a twofold request:
> 1) any suggestion for a better mean to trace down the instability
> problem of NTPd ?
> 2) any comment on the current quality of openntpd, notably if it is
> suitable to be run in pool.ntp.org
>
> thanks
>
What is "Open ntpd"? Where did you get it? Are your really talking
about the reference implementation?
More information about the questions
mailing list