[ntp:questions] Sub-millisecond NTP synchronization for local network
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Tue Dec 9 01:27:16 UTC 2008
Ryan Malayter <malayter at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2 at hp.com> wrote:
> > "All" the 10G NICs and I suspect a decent number of the 1G NICs
> > support TSO or TCP/Transport Segmentation Offload. For the sender at
> > least that can be considered a "poor man's jumbo frame." Many (most?)
> > of the curent 10G NICs also support LRO or Large Receive Offload.
> I don't think you'll ever see baseline support for such features on
> Linux. The kernel guys fundamentally disagree with TCP offload:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:TOE
I believe you are confusing TSO and LRO, which are stateless offloads
(TCP connection state) with TOE (TCP Offload Engine) which is a
statefull offload - TCP connection state kept in the card rather than
the host stack. It is indeed true there is a considerable and likely
to continue immune response in "netdev" to TOE, but they are quite
pleased with stateless offloads like TSO and LRO.
rick jones
--
a wide gulf separates "what if" from "if only"
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
More information about the questions
mailing list