[ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)
mayer at ntp.isc.org
Mon Jan 28 03:44:31 UTC 2008
David L. Mills wrote:
> It doesn't stop working; it just clamps whatever it gets to +-500 PPM as
> appropriate. If the intrinsic error is greater than 500 PPM, the loop
> will do what it can with the residual it can't correct showing as a
> systematic time ofset.
I didn't mean to suggest that ntpd stopped running. It was that the
clock was drifting steadily off into the sunset. I realize that if the
problem corrected itself ntpd would bring things back to normal.
> Danny Mayer wrote:
>> David L. Mills wrote:
>>> Unless the computer clock intrinsic frequency error is huge, the only
>>> time the 500-PPM kicks in is with a 100-ms step transient and poll
>>> interval 16 s. The loop still works if it hits the stops; it just can't
>>> drive the offset to zero.
>> Yes, I found this out when my laptop stopped disciplined the clock and
>> was complaining about the frequency limits and I started digging into
>> the code to figure out why.
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
More information about the questions