[ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
kostecke at ntp.org
Wed Jan 30 20:27:25 UTC 2008
On 2008-01-30, Unruh <unruh-spam at physics.ubc.ca> wrote:
> Again while I understand the desire for robustness, designing [NTP]
> so it always assumes very worst case scenario seems like overkill.
> Very few people are 160msec away from servers. Also the use of "pre"
> packets ( whether ping or ntp) really would be useful in ntp precisely
> to wake up switches and reduce these kinds of switch delays.
If you wish to have a specific feature in NTP you can add it yourself
using the source which is available for download from:
If you want someone else to do the work please consider joining the NTP
Forum http://ntpforum.isc.org/ to help fund development.
Steve Kostecke <kostecke at ntp.org>
NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/
More information about the questions