[ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.
david at ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid
Thu Jan 31 22:20:27 UTC 2008
David L. Mills wrote:
> The result of the sort is usually the first entry on the list, but even
I thought this only gave the figure head peer, but that the actual clock
disciplining used a weighted average of some number of candidates aa well.
> that can be temporarily displaced by the anti-clockhop algorithm. Other
> than this wiggle, it can be truthfully said that the algorithm selects
> the servers at the lowest stratum and from among those at that stratum
> the candidate with the lowest maximum error.
More information about the questions