[ntp:questions] poll interval - RFC compliance question
stenn at ntp.org
Fri Jun 13 23:59:58 UTC 2008
>>> In article <qjA4k.8843$E41.6742 at text.news.virginmedia.com>, "David J Taylor" <david-taylor at blueyonder.neither-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> writes:
David> Harlan Stenn wrote: 
>> Finally, I encourage you and everybody else who is working for a company
>> that has an interest in NTP to get your company to join the the NTP
>> Forum, http://ntpforum.isc.org . I am happy to do whatever I can to make
>> membership in the NTP Forum a valuable experience.
David> But that's a closed club to paying members only, is it? I've heard
David> nothing for months, despite expressing an interest.....
David> Thanks, David
And here's another slant - Anton wrote his post apparently as part of a
commercial need his employer has. This need encompasses clarifications of
the NTP specification (progress on which has been *painfully* slow for a
variety of reasons), perhaps some regulatory compliance, and
I don't think those needs are being met by the current process. Some folks
agree with me. Some do not.
David, you participate here a fair amount. Are you satisfied with the
"state" of NTP? Is this involvement of yours (just) a personal choice or do
you have other reasons for being interested in NTP?
If it's more than a personal project for you, what are *you* doing to help
the project flourish?
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member!
More information about the questions