[ntp:questions] poll interval - RFC compliance question
stenn at ntp.org
Sun Jun 15 06:35:27 UTC 2008
>>> In article <PgL4k.9084$E41.7726 at text.news.virginmedia.com>, "David J Taylor" <david-taylor at blueyonder.neither-this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> writes:
David> Harlan Stenn wrote: 
>> David, you participate here a fair amount. Are you satisfied with the
>> "state" of NTP? Is this involvement of yours (just) a personal choice or
>> do you have other reasons for being interested in NTP?
>> If it's more than a personal project for you, what are *you* doing to
>> help the project flourish?
David> Thanks for your clarification of the "NTP Forum" status. As a
David> private individual, I cannot afford corporate membership level fees.
No worries, and this thread has, so far, been addressing *institutional*
memberhsip of the NTP Forum, not *individual* membership in that group.
David> I am simply interested in helping people deploy NTP on client systems
David> as widely as possible, as I feel that good timekeeping is beneficial
David> to us all (when diagnosing fault chains, for example). I have no
David> business or commercial interest in NTP.
Understood, and I appreciate your efforts.
I just wanted to be clear that I was addressing issues faced by
*institutions* when using NTP, and their needs are different from those of
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member!
More information about the questions