[ntp:questions] "ntpd -q" is slow compared to ntpdate
david at ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid
Sun Oct 19 09:27:07 UTC 2008
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> This discussion dates back to August, 2002.
> Please see
The argument there seems to be not that ntpdate is worse than SNTP, but
that there is an implied promise that it is almost as good as ntpd. The
reason for having SNTP is to have something which has no pretensions of
being anything other than crude.
More information about the questions