[ntp:questions] Mixed maxpoll values for mixed LAN/Internet servers - sensible?
David J Taylor
david-taylor at blueyonder.neither-this-bit.nor-this.co.uk
Fri Feb 27 16:55:35 UTC 2009
Dave Hart wrote:
> On Feb 26, 11:27 pm, "David J Taylor"
> <david-tay... at blueyonder.neither- this-bit.nor-this.co.uk> wrote:
>> Well, by observation, /all/ the servers are polled at 64s intervals,
>> and not just the lan-gps-pps server.
> Since your clients are naturally preferring the stratum 1 on the same
> LAN, that server's poll interval is clamping your overall poll
> interval down with it. In the similar configuration of a refclock
> plus internet servers, if you set minpoll 4 on a reference clock (and
> no maxpoll) the similarly unselected internet servers are allowed to
> progress to higher poll intervals. It may not be possible to achieve
> the same without a reference clock.
Thats doesn't seem to happen with my FreeBSD system, if I am understanding
you correctly. Admittedly I have ntpd 4.2.0-a, but all servers have a 64s
polls even though there is no minpoll or maxpoll specified. My
understanding was that having the physical GPS/PPS connection to that
system forced this.
> My suggestion is to pick one ntpd on your LAN to sacrafice the best
> LAN timekeeping performance on while providing internet sources to
> your LAN in case of problems with the FreeBSD refclock box.
> Dave Hart
Thanks for your suggestions - which are certainly worthy of consideration.
However, apart from the Vista PC, I consider the timekeeping on my
existing Windows PCs adequate for my needs - I'm not after sub-millisecond
accuracy. And of course, if I move to using one of the Windows PCs
instead of the FreeBSD box as my stratum 1 server, I'll need to consider
the configuration once again.
The clients certainly lock to the local stratum 1 clock provided by the
FreeBSD server, and it would be nice if the other servers listed in those
clients could be automatically demoted to a "check every so often just for
More information about the questions