[ntp:questions] NTP Performance on WINNT
chaofu.chen at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 15:22:38 UTC 2009
On Jul 20, 10:36 pm, "David J Taylor" <david-tay... at blueyonder.not-
> paul wrote:
> > Hi All, I'm new to NTP, glad to meet you here.
> > I did some experiments to test NTP performance on WINNT. In an
> > isolated network, two machines are inter connnected with a switcher.
> > Machine A is configure as a stratum 12 NTP server, using lcl as
> > reference clock; machine B is sychronized to machine A. Then, 'ntpq -
> > p' is performed on machine B every 16 seconds. The output of ntpq is
> > cooked by a python script and offset field is recorded to log file.
> > After about 2 hours, I check the log file and found the offset value
> > is 4 ~ 8 ms. Is this normal? I mean if things are properly done, how
> > small the offset I can expect? Thanks.
> > The OS is Windows XP Pro SP3 and NTP software is 4.2.4-p7 from
> > mainberg.
> For comparison, I have the performance of a mixture of Windows systems
> running a mixture of NTP versions plotter here:
> The Windows XP system synced to a local stratum-1 clock is Narvik, showing
> an offset of within 1.5ms, but that is with a poll interval clamped to
> 64s. The best is the system Feenix with a local GPS serial and PPS
> reference clock (but no temperature control) where the offset is within
> about 0.2ms, and the worst the Windows Vista system Gemini which has a
> DVB/USB data reception system capturing about 20GB/day, but clobbering the
> offset with transient peaks of at least 50ms.
> "How long is a piece of string...." comes to mind!
Thank you, David.
In my situation, no GPS is availiable. So can I expect better
performance when GPS is used as reference clock, or when a stratum-1
NTP server is added to the network?
And, I noticed the offset for Narvik is more stable than that for
Hydra, is it due the PPS feeded to Narvik? But Bacchus is doing good
too without PPS, Why?
More information about the questions