[ntp:questions] Local (own site) NTP servers.

Kevin Oberman oberman at es.net
Wed Jul 29 05:11:11 UTC 2009


> From: Danny Mayer <mayer at ntp.org>
USENET newsgroup comp.protocols.time.ntp\)" <questions.lists.ntp.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions>, 	<mailto:questions-request at lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions>
> List-Post: <mailto:questions at lists.ntp.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:questions-request at lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions>, 	<mailto:questions-request at lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: questions-bounces+oberman=es.net at lists.ntp.org
> Errors-To: questions-bounces+oberman=es.net at lists.ntp.org
> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2009-07-28_09:2009-07-24,2009-07-28,2009-07-28 signatures=0
> X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0811170000 definitions=main-0907280208
> X-Regulatory-Partner: 1
> 
> David Woolley wrote:
> > Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> > 
> >> ISTR reading that the Intel 80x86 line was CISC on top and RISC 
> >> underneath.  I couldn't swear to it though.  All I ever saw or worked 
> >> with was the CISC part of it.
> > 
> > I think that pretty much defines CISC.  CISC machines are normally 
> > micro-program driven machines.
> 
> They didn't used to be. However, with the VAX 8600, for example, the
> instruction set was implemented in microcode. So were the diagnostics
> for that matter.

True. but that was before the time of most of the readers here. Most CISC processors after about 1972 were micro-engine based. the original PDP-11 was not, but it was soon re-engineered as the PDP-11/20 with a micro-coded processor.  The PDP-11 was the last non-micro-coded system from Digital. IBM went to micro-coded systems for their main-frames about the same time as did most others. 

So, while CISC could be done without a micro-engine, it was onlhy the earliest of the CISC mechines that did so. All VAX systems had micro-engines including the origianl 11/780 and 11/750.

Most systems before the late 60's were effectively RISC, although no one called them that. The PDP-8 instruction set was 8 basic commands, AND, TAD, ISZ, DCA, JMS, JMP, IOP, and OPR. The OPR instructions were, effectively, a micro-engine of 19 slightly more complex instructions, but all were implemented in very simple DTL logic and none took more than a single cycle and the full 27 insgtructions were simpler than most RISC processors.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751





More information about the questions mailing list