[ntp:questions] Test internal clock
unruh-spam at physics.ubc.ca
Fri Mar 20 03:36:45 UTC 2009
"Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> writes:
>Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> Please be more tolerant.
>> Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles.
>> Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal
>>>>> In article <dNudnURmdN9V7lzUnZ2dnUVZ_h-WnZ2d at giganews.com>, "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> writes:
>> Richard> Towli wrote:
>>>> Wau - Thank you ! i bellieve thats exactly what i needed. It works on my
>>>> personal pc but not on my domain pc. I bellieve port 123 is blocked in
>>>> the firewall at work. Can i somehow verify if there is open for port udp
>>>> port 123 and if it is not open, is there an alternative way to do what is
>>>> done with that command? Best rgds /T "Rob" <nomail at example.com> skrev i
>>>> meddelelsen news:slrngs2qsr.2u4f.nomail at xs7.xs4all.nl...
>>>>> Towli <towli at oldboyz.dk> wrote: Hi
>>>>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
>>>>> ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our domain time
>>>>> not synchronised properly).
>>>>> Is there a way to do this?
>>>>> w32tm /monitor /computers:pool.ntp.org
>> Richard> Please don't top post!
>> Richard> Ask your network manager about port 123/UDP. He should be able to
>> Richard> tell you if he has it blocked and, perhaps, will be willing to open
>> Richard> it if you tell him you need it.
>It seems that the "vast majority" disagree. I'm not about to jump on
>your patron for top posting; I think he's earned the right to do what he
>wants. For everyone else. . . .
>a. Bottom posting is the custom!
>b. It makes a lot of sense to have a discussion in order, from top to
And it makes even more sense to have it at the top so that I can see that
the response is totally off topic without having to scroll through the
whole rest of the ancient history of the post.
More information about the questions