[ntp:questions] Stick to PPS, even if the prefer server fails

alkopedia at googlemail.com alkopedia at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 29 14:37:57 UTC 2009


On Mar 29, 5:12 am, mi... at udel.edu (David Mills) wrote:
> John,
>
> The intended design to detect and suppress bad reference/PPS clocks is
> at least two additional sources, that do not have to be reference
> clocks. If the reference/PPS clock sails to the sunset, the selection
> algorithm will vote it off and the PPS will follow.

In my case I would trust my PPS signal much more than any other
source. Why should I run a caesium frequency normal and not trust it?




More information about the questions mailing list