[ntp:questions] 500ppm - is it too small?
mills at udel.edu
Thu May 7 20:52:07 UTC 2009
Don't conclude the 1000-Hz Linux problem is lost interrutps. My old
Alpha under Tru64 ran at 1024 Hz and never lost an interrupt.
From previous posts it seems the Linx kernelmongers didn't realize
changing the timer frequency requires changing the kernel discipline
phase and frequency gains. The phase gain is multiplied by the inverse
ratio of the new frequency divided by 100 Hz and the phase gain is
multiplied by the inverse square of this ratio. Some gent some time back
did that and Linux got well. I don't know what the Windows timer
frequency is or whether it has a kernel discipline similar to Unix, but
that consideration might apply there, too.
If the Windows kernel uses only the Unix adjtime() model and no kernel
discipline, the above does not apply.
Terje Mathisen wrote:
>Hal Murray wrote:
>>>An greater than 500 PPM suggests seriously broken hardware!
>This sounds a lot like the trouble many Linux boxes got into with
>HZ=1000, where dropped timer ticks could cause all sorts of problems in
>the form of unstable systems clocks that seemed to lose a lot more than
More information about the questions