[ntp:questions] Query about NTP accuracy
hal-usenet at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net
Sun May 31 02:52:38 UTC 2009
In article <1243711613.525216 at news1nwk>,
Brian Utterback <brian.utterback at sun.com> writes:
>David Woolley wrote:
>> It only requires 2. The argument about having four initially is about
>> having a clear majority even after rejecting one.
>I am not sure what you are saying. Are you saying that 4 servers allow
>you to have a failed server and then outvote a falseticker. I don't
>think that is true. And it definitely takes three servers to outvote
>one falseticker in some cases. NTP deals in intervals, and it takes
>two servers to define one interval, and then one more to make that
>interval outvote all the others possible intervals. So, three servers
>will always outvote a single falseticker, but two will not always
>outvote a single falseticker.
What cases does it take 3 servers to outvote a falseticker?
I thought the idea behind using 4 severs was that 3 was the magic
number (2 could outvote a falseticker) and you still had 3 after
1 (of the 4) died.
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
More information about the questions