[ntp:questions] NTP on small 100% Linux LAN : reasonable access control policy ?

Kiss Gabor kissg at ssg.ki.iif.hu
Tue Aug 3 08:58:57 UTC 2010


In article <slrni5fh3t.om8.nomail at xs8.xs4all.nl>,
	Rob <nomail at example.com> writes:
>>> restrict default 127.0.0.1 mask 255.0.0.0
> 
> It should be: restrict 127.0.0.1 mask 255.0.0.0

Do you mean "restrict 127.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0"? :)
Several IP stack implementations refuse 1 bits on masked out positions.

Gabor




More information about the questions mailing list