[ntp:questions] problem with ntpd refclock and pps via parallel port
snews at lordynet.org
Mon Feb 1 22:20:42 UTC 2010
> On 2010-02-01, David Lord <snews at lordynet.org> wrote:
>> unruh wrote:
>>> On 2010-01-31, David Lord <snews at lordynet.org> wrote:
>>>> problem with ntpd refclock and pps via parallel port
>>>> So does pps really need a refclock and/or does pps via
>>>> parallel work ok or not on NetBSD-5?
>>> Yes. Otherwise it has no idea what the seconds is. Ie, all pps does is
>>> deliver a pulse at the exact second boundary, but that says nothing
>>> about which second that is the boundary of. You need some other source
>>> to give you the seconds.
>> Sorry, I missed mention of the local ntp peers.
>> There were three local servers to give time to second, one being
>> a pool server with radioclock that I was attempting to distribute
>> pps from via parallel port. Docs I have indicate a server can be
>> used to get "second" in place of refclock,
> Yes, it certainly can. However you should make sure that your system is
> within a half second of the correct time before starting the PPS.
> Otherwise the PPS will just take the current seconds, and lock you onto
> a time which is out by seconds.
Now I han have another play with this I find that I must
have still been on serial DCD since disconnect of parallel
lead made no difference. Symlink was pps0 -> lpt0 and I
was sure I'd restarted ntpd ok before going to bed late
this morning. Now a restart gives the configuration failed
and no PPS.
I've moved symlink back to pps0 -> tty00 and ntpd restarted
this time with minpoll 4.
I'll go back to playing with lpt port for another day. I'd
just expected it to work.
More information about the questions