[ntp:questions] nmea and initial large offset
unruh at wormhole.physics.ubc.ca
Sat May 22 23:15:29 UTC 2010
On 2010-05-22, Mr. James W. Laferriere <babydr at baby-dragons.com> wrote:
> This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
> while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ns3.baby-dragons.com id
> Hello Dave ,
> On Sat, 22 May 2010, Dave Hart wrote:
>> On May 6, 06:42=A0UTC, Rini van Zetten wrote:
>>>> =A0when i start ntpd.
>>>>> But when the clock offset is big (1-1-1970 for example),
>>>>> =A0the ntpd refuses to use the gps reference clock.
>>>>> Using the "-g" option does not make any difference.
>>>> Does -g -q -x before starting NTPd as a service not get you there?
>>> This does also not work. Thanks all for you input.
>>> I'm afraid i have to add a workaround in my application which also get=
> s the gps input,
>>> to set the time when it's more then 4 hours away from gps time.
>> I think a better answer is to disable ntpd's "panic" threshold
>> entirely with "tinker panic 0" in ntp.conf.
>> Hoping to stick a fork in the meat of this conversation,
>> Dave Hart
> Can you please share any good AND bad side effects from adding this=20
> option to our conf files ?
> I do not have enough knowledge about the internals of ntpd to make head=
> or tail what side effects there may be form this .
The side effect is that if the time diverges by more than 4 hr, ntp will
keep running ( and should step the clock at its first opportunity
More information about the questions