[ntp:questions] "ntpd: synchronized to"
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null at BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid
Thu May 26 21:38:00 UTC 2011
Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm a tad reluctant to tell the clients to use the entire
> fleet of local NTP servers, albeit they are of similar
> quality. These 3 clients are members of a DB cluster
> and it's more important to keep them in sync with each other,
> rather than in sync with some abstract "true time".
> So, if some local NTP servers start wondering off and
> fracture the cluster time-wise, that's bad.
> Hence the tendency to keep the config tight and small.
> Are there better approaches?
In addition to the clients using the local NTP servers,
tos cohort 1 & peer prefer the 3 clients to each other?
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
More information about the questions