[ntp:questions] Facing some issue in the ntp version Ver. 4.2.6p1
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null at BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid
Wed Aug 1 23:06:26 UTC 2012
Martin Burnicki wrote:> If in current versions of ntpd the local clock stays
> selected as system peer after the daemon has started even
> though good upstream time sources are available, or if it
> "eats up the -g flag" after startup so ntpd terminates
> itself when remote servers become available and the
> initial time offset exceeds the sanity limit, then in
> my opinion the local clock driver is just broken in the
> current version of ntpd and should be fixed. I don't know
> if what the OP has found out could already be part of a fix.
> As said above, this used to work perfectly with older
> versions, and it should be up to the user if they are
> satisfied with a simple, easy configuration, or if they
> want a more enhanced configuration requiring much more
> basic knowledge to get it working as expected.
It seemed to me like the issue was there was only one
external reference, and ntp was unable to win the
byzantine battle with just itself & one other, it didn't
know who was lying.
... and IIRC the initial description seemed like it was
sort of the opposite of a blade server; Several embedded
proc cards in slots of a computer?
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
More information about the questions