[ntp:questions] ntpd wedged again

Dave Hart davehart at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 15:08:58 UTC 2012


On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:42, A C <agcarver+ntp at acarver.net> wrote:
> On 2/11/2012 01:21, A C wrote:
>
> This is the more recent status though I'm not sure why the PPS is marked as
> bad.
>
>>     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset
>>  jitter
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> x127.127.22.0    .PPS.            0 l    5   16  377    0.000    0.002
>> 0.122
>>  127.127.28.0    .GPSD.           4 l   84  128  377    0.000  -30.840
>>  15.522
>> +69.65.40.29     209.51.161.238   2 u   36  128  377   74.436    1.585
>> 0.199
>> -169.229.70.201  169.229.128.214  3 u  111  128  377   37.326    3.009
>> 0.571
>> +198.137.202.16  69.36.224.15     2 u  111  128  377   36.641    1.851
>> 0.400
>> *130.207.165.28  130.207.244.240  2 u   95  128  377   78.266    1.667
>> 0.736
>> -131.144.4.10    130.207.244.240  2 u   40  128  377   85.358    3.798
>> 1.243

See http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/cluster.html with the
understanding that falsetickers (x in peer tally code in first column)
are those pruned by the cluster algorithm.

Cheers,
Dave Hart


More information about the questions mailing list