[ntp:questions] Oddities in termination of cable from gps18.
David J Taylor
david-taylor at blueyonder.co.uk.invalid
Thu Feb 23 18:00:18 UTC 2012
>> - ground and +5V
>> - ground and RX
>> - ground and TX
>> - ground and PPS/DCD
> That is what I used and then got poor result. (Yes I have a scope) I
> figured the reason has that all the conductors called "ground" above
> where tied to gather at the DB9 shells pin-5 at each end of the cable
> So the return current divides. You then don't have balanced twisted
> pairs. You are right about it being a capacitor but really it's
> several caps that all interact.
> I think the better way to use cat-5 is like this
> RX, TX, DCD, ground
> With each of the above in a "solid" color wire. I think you get less
> capacitance that way
> Also while many RS232 ports will accept TTL signals, if they do they
> are operating way off spec and you are just lucky it works. You
> really should be sure the PPS, TX and RX signals are at rs232 voltage
> levels. out of spec voltages and long cables are a bad combination.
> I've converted to rg58 drives with 50R driver for the PPS and then
> convert is very close to the computer to RS232. No ringing.
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
Thanks for that information - most interesting.
Could you please explain just how you are doing the wiring? You are using
the cable just as a four-way cable, and not using the second conductor of
each pair, is that it? And you aren't sending +5V up the wire? Using
separate earths which this implies may have caused the problems you
describe, I only have one end of the system grounded here. Unless you
have a long run and fast edges, I don't believe that the capacitance
Completely agree about using RS-232 levels wherever possible, and that's
what I use on my Sure GPS Evaluation board, and the modification I
described. The slower RS-232 edges and specified receiver hysteresis are
more tolerant of cable runs.
My gut feeling is that for the average stratum-1 user, correctly
terminated RG58 and matched drivers and receivers for the PPS is beyond
the precision level required.
More information about the questions