[ntp:questions] Have Pi, have GPS = low powered NTP server?
brian.utterback at oracle.com
Fri Jun 8 13:36:50 UTC 2012
On 6/7/2012 11:24 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
> On 6/7/2012 3:47 PM, Brian Utterback wrote:
>> BlackLists wrote:
>>> Try something like: ntpq -n -c "lpe" -c "las" -c "rv&0" -c "rv&1" -c
>>> "rv&2" -c "rv&3" -c "rv&4" The easily readable parts, and the flash
>>> code might give you more insight.
>> Actually, you can do this a little more efficiently like this:
>> ntpq -n -c lpe -c las -c "rv&0" -c "mrv&1&9"
> That only works if you know there are 9 (unless it has been changed),
> you get 0 then nothing because there are less than 9,
> however the way I did it, if there were only 1 or 2, or 3,
> it works for the ones that exist, and returns errors for the others,
> as they way you did it, you get nothing if there are less then 9.
Quite right, now. It used to work. It was a feature introduced by [Bug
192] Unfortunately, a change made 18 months ago that is marked "Allow
ntpq &1 associd use without preceding association-fetching. Use libntp's
months" removed the code that clamped the index value at the maximum
association id. I just filed [Bug 2220] to get it put back.
More information about the questions