[ntp:questions] outout of ntpq -p
atul14.kumar at gmail.com
Tue May 22 16:08:17 UTC 2012
thanks for reply.
Yes, this is my problem that address is allocated for ipv4 address, so
i can't see my complete ipv6 address, and i am not able to know that
what is complete ipv6 address of server i am synced with ( like in
this case, i am synced with server 2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 while i see
only 2001:5b0:3eff:f as output of ntpq -p) . I there any other way to
know the server i am synced with.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:34 AM, unruh <unruh at invalid.ca> wrote:
> On 2012-05-21, Atul Gupta <atul14.kumar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am running my ntpd in ipv6 multicast mode, below is my conf file :-
>> multicastclient ff05::101
>> disable auth
>> driftfile /var/log/ntp/drift
>> logfile /var/log/ntp/ntp.log
>> I am syncing with ntp server whose ip is :- 2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310
>> , which i can verify through my ntp logs ( below ) :-
>> receive: at 8364 ff05::101<-2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 mode 5 len 48
>> clock_filter: n 8 off -0.015410 del 0.000000 dsp 0.000960 jit 0.006433
>> select: combine offset -0.015410374 jitter 0.006432542
>> clock_update: at 8364 sample 8364 associd 16381
>> local_clock: offset -0.015410000 jit 0.009358219 freq 8.668 stab 0.061 poll 6
>> receive: at 8430 ff05::101<-2001:5b0:3eff:fffa::310 mode 5 len 48
>> clock_filter: n 8 off -0.020993 del 0.000000 dsp 0.000959 jit 0.006987
>> select: combine offset -0.020992699 jitter 0.006987410
>> clock_update: at 8430 sample 8430 associd 16381
>> local_clock: offset -0.020993000 jit 0.008973546 freq 8.585 stab 0.064 poll 6
>> But, when i run ntpq program to check the ntp status, i get following out out :-
>> # ntpq -p
>> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
>> *2001:5b0:3eff:f LOCAL(0) 11 m 17 64 376 0.000 8.151 25.053
>> It seems that ipv6 address doesn't accommodate completely in this,
>> that's why i see incomplete ipv6 address ( 2001:5b0:3eff:f ), is there
>> a way to fix this issue.
> What is the issue? What do you need help for and why? Is it aesthetic?
> V6 addresses are too long for the V4 space alloted to addresses in the
> output, so they are truncated. But why is this a problem?
>> Please help!!!
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
More information about the questions