[ntp:questions] offline machines' time synchronization
Chris Albertson
albertson.chris at gmail.com
Fri May 25 17:50:03 UTC 2012
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at
tmsw.no"@ntp.org> wrote:
> Chris Albertson wrote:
>
>> Next how to get the PPS to be at the top of the second. Two methods
>>
>> 1) don't bother. Linux PPS will log the time of both the GPS's PPS
>> and the Rb PPS. Read the log file to determine the offset. This give
>> offset with uSec precision. To get better you need a hardware time
>> interval counter. I happen to have a few of those and can read
>> sub-nanoseconds but this is gross overkill. Microseconds are good
>> enough for NTP......
>>
>
> Much simpler would be to use a fudge command to specify the current phase
> offset between the Rb and GPS PPS signals, i.e. if the Db happened to start
> out 367 ms off, just let ntpd know that these pulses are supposed to have
> such an offset.
>
>
Yes, correct the "fudge" method is what I was getting at in #1 above. I
assumed that every on here would know to use the measured difference in a
"fudge" but the key is measuring the offset. Get that from the log file.
or a TIC if you have one.
But there is a problem in the even with the best Rb the offset will drift
over time.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
More information about the questions
mailing list