[ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch
Mark C. Stephens
marks at non-stop.com.au
Wed Aug 14 12:28:28 UTC 2013
Um Let's see, Datum was bought by Austron, who was bought by ... etc.
For collectors such as myself, having this 'mature' equipment still working is great.
Looking at Mr Malone's code, he added 2 lines which enabled NTPD compatibility with GPS receivers that would have long ago have been sent to the TIP as waste.
It is shame as a society we are being trained to consume.
New model phone, got to have it so they queue up outside the shop 2 days before its released.
Never mind they have a fully functional working phone already! Just got to have the latest.
We need to start reducing our waste product,
These manufacturers that design equipment to die a month after the warranty finishes should be put on the wall of shame for a start.
But, I digress off subject for this newsgroup...
I have heard of people in desperation trying to patch the firmware of the receiver. But along came David with his patch for NTPD and put a lot of us at rest.
Thanks David :)
From: questions-bounces+marks=non-stop.com.au at lists.ntp.org [mailto:questions-bounces+marks=non-stop.com.au at lists.ntp.org] On Behalf Of unruh
Sent: Wednesday, 14 August 2013 9:55 PM
To: questions at lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch
On 2013-08-14, Mark C. Stephens <marks at non-stop.com.au> wrote:
> Good on you David and welcome back to 2013.
> I do hope that some official changes are made to refclock_nmea to catch this receiver bug and process it accordingly.
> There are a lot of folks stranded in 1993.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: questions-bounces+marks=non-stop.com.au at lists.ntp.org
> [mailto:questions-bounces+marks=non-stop.com.au at lists.ntp.org] On
> Behalf Of David Malone
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 August 2013 5:30 AM
> To: questions at lists.ntp.org
> Subject: Re: Start of new GPS 1024 week epoch
> Magnus Danielson <magnus at rubidium.dyndns.org> writes:
>>Remember that any Sunday, it is likely that a GPS reciever have
>>slipped a multiple of 1024 weeks. NTP drivers should be able to
>>recognice it and compensate for it, as it is a re-occuring bug in many recievers.
>>This issue have been discussed over and over again at time-nuts.
Surely if the receiver is delivering the wrong date, it is the receiver manufacturer that needs to make the changes, not ntp, including sending you a new receiver if necessary. Warrenty limits notwithstanding, this fails that "fitness for purpose" test, and you could hardly have detected it when you bought it.
> It seems my ancient GPSclock 200 has recently slipped back to December 1993 too. Resetting it hasn't helped and I doubt I will be able to do a firmware update, so I've made a hack to refclock_nmea.c (version ntp-4.2.6p5), by replacing:
> reftime.l_ui += caltontp(&date);
> reftime.l_ui += caltontp(&date);
> while (reftime.l_i + 512*7*86400 < rd_timestamp.l_i)
> reftime.l_i += 1024*7*86400;
> I'm trying to adjust the timestamp given by NMEA might be slow by some multiple of 1024 weeks, and so tries to adjust it so that it is reasonably close to the system time associated with the read of the NMEA data. I'm not sure if I've got the code exactly bang-on, but it has got ntp running with the unit again.
Except of course if the rd_timestamp.l_i is way out (that is why one would want to use a gps clock to fix it-- eg on bootup with the Raspberry Pi say),
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
questions mailing list
questions at lists.ntp.org
More information about the questions