[ntp:questions] Does this look sane, is PPS working?
kostecke at ntp.org
Tue Feb 12 18:37:36 UTC 2013
On 2013-02-12, james machado <hvgeekwtrvl at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Ralph Aichinger <ralph at pangea.at>
>> Does this look sane to you for a Raspberry Pi with a Sure Electronics
>> board and PPS enabled? It looks fine to me, I just want to confirm
>> that people more experienced than me see it the same way.
>> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
>> oGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS. 0 l 3 16 377 0.000 -0.005 0.001
> I would expect to see a PPS line if you have PPS up and working
The 'o' tally code at the beginning of the GPS_NMEA line is telling
you that your GPS is the PPS peer. Plus the offset and jitter are
appropriate for a PPS ref-clock.
The tally codes are listed at http://doc.ntp.org/4.2.6p5/decode.html#peer
Steve Kostecke <kostecke at ntp.org>
NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/
More information about the questions