[ntp:questions] better rate limiting against amplification attacks?

Harlan Stenn stenn at ntp.org
Thu Jan 16 04:18:50 UTC 2014


For me, your "information/attitude ratio" (similar to a "sigal/noise
ratio") skews towards trolldom enough that I often just don't bother
responding to what you write.

I would have sent this privately but I have no idea what your real email
address is.

William Unruh writes:
> On 2014-01-15, Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org> wrote:
> > William Unruh writes:
> >> I do not mean the default in the config file, I mean the default if
> >> there is no config file or if nothing is set in the config file.
> >
> > Then ntpd won't connect to anything and there will be no data to report.
> That was why the sentence "if nothing is set in the config file" by
> which I meant nothing with respect to what we are discussing. I agree
> that the config file needs some 
> server
> lines to know where to get the time base from (those should be pool
> directives).
> >
> _______________________________________________
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

More information about the questions mailing list