[ntp:questions] Thoughts on KOD

Harlan Stenn stenn at ntp.org
Tue Jul 8 05:46:53 UTC 2014


John Hasler writes:
> I wrote:
> > Would it be useful to offer an "official" minimal implementation
> > intended for embedded systems so that these people won't feel the need
> > to code their own?  Maybe add minimal NTP support to Busybox?
> 
> Brian Inglis writes:
> > AIUI an updated v4 sntp client will be released to replace ntpdate.
> > How about specifying the sntp core as an RFC for an embedded NTP
> > client?
> 
> That would be even better.  Designers could then claim they "have to"
> use it to be standards compliant.

Network Time Foundation is also working on some Certification and
Compliance programs.  If we can get these up and running (it doesn't
happen for free) that should also help a lot.
-- 
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!


More information about the questions mailing list