[ntp:questions] Compensating for asymmetric delay on a per-peer/server basis?
mike cook
michael.cook at sfr.fr
Thu Sep 11 19:50:00 UTC 2014
Le 11 sept. 2014 à 21:08, Paul a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:08 PM, mike cook <michael.cook at sfr.fr> wrote:
>> Did I miss something?
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Rich Wales <richw at richw.org> wrote:
>> My home LAN is connected to my school's network via a cable modem.
>
> If we make the (safe) assumption of a common cable ISP/FiOS in the
> Palo Alto area the path is asymmetric.
Yup, AsymmetricDSL does have different up/down bit rates. What I really meant was that the difference would not explain his issue.
ex: with a 12Mbps down rate and 1.3Mbps up rate, the ratio is around 40usec to 300usec transfer of a 48byte NTP packet.
> _______________________________________________
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
More information about the questions
mailing list