[ntp:questions] Rejected peers. But why?
Brian Inglis
Brian.Inglis at SystematicSw.ab.ca
Fri Feb 6 07:30:51 UTC 2015
On 2015-02-05 11:06, Sander Smeenk wrote:
> Quoting David Lord (snews at lordynet.org):
>> *GPS_NMEA(2) .GPSb. 7 l 64 377 0.000 -1.786 7.863
>> oPPS(2) .PPSb. 0 l 16 377 0.000 0.000 0.004
>> +mail0.lordy 81.187.61.78 3 u 64 377 0.801 -0.006 0.416
>> +mail.lordyn 81.187.61.78 3 u 64 377 0.869 0.010 0.509
>> +ns3.lordyne 81.187.61.78 3 u 64 377 1.309 -0.209 0.481
>> e350n1b.hom 192.168.59.61 2 u 64 377 0.459 0.014 0.586
>> me6000g.hom 192.168.59.61 2 u 16 377 0.480 0.001 0.597
>> p3x1300.hom 192.168.59.61 2 u 64 377 0.317 0.356 0.544
>> +xxxxxxxxxxx 195.66.241.2 2 u 256 377 18.087 -1.466 0.365
>>
>> E350n1b, me6000g and p3x1300 can't be selected because they
>> are all synced to me6000e.
>>
>> You possibly need to add at least one extra independent ntp
>> source.
>
> Yes. This was indeed the problem.
> My mind not only wanders, it sometimes leaves completely.
You need a majority of truechimers over falsetickers, so you need three
independent sources to tolerate one being off occasionally, five to allow
two off, etc. if the sources
David has 3 falsetickers but 6 truechimers so selection succeeds.
Wander > 1 is always an issue ;^>
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis
More information about the questions
mailing list