[ntp:hackers] Core protocol document

David L. Mills mills at udel.edu
Fri Feb 3 14:16:29 UTC 2006


Guys,

Can someone relay a defanged version of my message? I was under the 
impression outbound messages were not vetted as well, but too many folks 
on this list reported otherwise.

Dave

Michael Davis wrote:

> The anomy package here
> 1) only looks at incoming mail
> 2) is setup to past most extensions (.jpg just added) without
> defanging the attachment
> 3) will only remove known bad attachments. (.exe, .com, etc.)
>
> mike
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> This is one of serveral reports about a message I sent to the group with
>> *.pdf attachment. I rechecked the original message and it did have a
>> valid *.pdf attachment. It was sent from my mills at eecis.udel.edu
>> mailbox. I have heard other reports that our mail system munches MIB
>> (*.mib) and JPEG (*.jpg) attachments but have not confirmed. Is it our
>> mail server that munches these messages? I can't do my job if it munches
>> *.pdf.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Reg Clemens wrote:
>>
>>>> David L. Mills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am enclosing a (very) preliminary draft of the core protocol
>>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> The message arrived without any enclosure or attachment. The headers
>>>> on the message seem to indicate that the UDEL filters munched on it.
>>>> Did anybody actually get the enclosure?
>>>>
>>> Nope, I suspect the X header says it all
>>>
>>> X-sanitizer: This message has been sanitized!
>>>
>



More information about the hackers mailing list