[ntp:hackers] kernel PPS time quality

todd glassey tglassey at earthlink.net
Mon Feb 6 02:11:29 UTC 2012


On 2/5/2012 5:37 PM, David L. Mills wrote:
> Todd,
> 
> I can't say I am wiser than you, but both Dreamweaver and Internet
> Explorer show the units correctly as microseconds with the correct
> symbol font. The source uses the font tag, which although it may be
> archaic, appears several hundred times in the source document
> collection. I am not about to chase down each and every one. Get used to
> it.

Typical response from you Dave -

I suggest you pull these documents down or post a notice that they
pertain to a version of NTP which existed a decade ago... so that you
personally are not misrepresenting them as currently accurate.

Todd


> 
> Dave
> 
> todd glassey wrote:
> 
>> On 2/5/2012 6:12 AM, David L. Mills wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Harlan,
>>>
>>> A wise man would check the units in that claim, possibly misrepresented,
>>> against one of many precision kernels, such as pogo.udel.edu.
>>>   
>>
>> An even wiser man would update his ancient presentations which clearly
>> state that the resolution is three milliseconds DR. Mills.
>>
>> Todd
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>> Professor,
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/kern.html says the typical
>>>> results from a PPS signal with the nanokernel are 3ms of accuracy. 
>>>> That
>>>> seems high to me.
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hackers mailing list
>>> hackers at lists.ntp.org
>>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/hackers
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Todd S. Glassey
This is from my personal email account and any materials from this
account come with personal disclaimers.

Further I OPT OUT of any and all commercial emailings.


More information about the hackers mailing list