[time] good news and bad news
Paul-Andrew Joseph Miseiko
Thu Nov 6 16:56:14 UTC 2003
I just can not find a reason to begin contemplating solutions to what I do
not conceive as being a problem. This is not the stratum 1's united mailing
list of the world. It was my understanding that the pool project was
created to reduce the load on common place stratum 1/2 servers. Given the
apparently increasing client load we are experience I would imagine the
objective is slowly being realized; and given the context of this project I
find this particular conversation highly disturbing and irrelevant.
On a side note, if you believe the merits of your NTP daemon is that of a
Stratum 1 and consequently consider multiple hosts from a single subnet do
not deserve simultaneous rights to it, restricting specific hosts or entire
subnets will undermine the integrity of this project.
- esoteric at teardrop.ca
From: timekeepers-bounces at fortytwo.ch
[mailto:timekeepers-bounces at fortytwo.ch] On Behalf Of wayne
Sent: November 6, 2003 9:41 AM
To: timekeepers at fortytwo.ch
Subject: Re: [time] good news and bad news
In <200311060904.52339.avbidder at fortytwo.ch> Adrian von Bidder
<avbidder at fortytwo.ch> writes:
>> What, if anything, could we do about it even if we wanted to?
> [...] Summary: I guess you can't do too much :-(
I was hoping there were some experiences from other public ntp servers
that might apply to the pool.
timekeepers mailing list
timekeepers at fortytwo.ch
More information about the pool